A correlative biomarker study and integrative prognostic model in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide

María P. Fernandez-Perez, Enrique Perez-Navarro, Teresa Alonso-Gordoa, Vicenza Conteduca, Albert Font, Sergio Vázquez-Estévez, Aránzazu González-del-Alba, Daniel Wetterskog, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Begona Mellado, Ovidio Fernandez-Calvo, María J. Méndez-Vidal, Miguel A. Climent, Ignacio Duran, Enrique Gallardo, Angel Rodriguez Sanchez, Carmen Santander, Maria I. Sáez, Javier Puente, Julian TudelaAlberto Martínez, Maria J. López-Andreo, José Padilla, Rebeca Lozano, David Hervas, Jun Luo, Ugo de Giorgi, Daniel Castellano, Gerhardt Attard, Enrique Grande, Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: There is a considerable need to incorporate biomarkers of resistance to new antiandrogen agents in the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of enzalutamide in first-line chemo-naïve asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC and analyzed the prognostic value of TMPRSS2-ERG and other biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), androgen receptor splice variant (AR-V7) in CTCs and plasma Androgen Receptor copy number gain (AR-gain). These biomarkers were correlated with treatment response and survival outcomes and developed a clinical–molecular prognostic model using penalized cox-proportional hazard model. This model was validated in an independent cohort. Results: Ninety-eight patients were included. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene was detected in 32 patients with no differences observed in efficacy outcomes. CTC detection was associated with worse outcome and AR-V7 in CTCs was associated with increased rate of progression as best response. Plasma AR gain was strongly associated with an adverse outcome, with worse median prostate specific antigen (PSA)-PFS (4.2 vs. 14.7 m; p < 0.0001), rad-PFS (4.5 vs. 27.6 m; p < 0.0001), and OS (12.7 vs. 38.1 m; p < 0.0001). The clinical prognostic model developed in PREVAIL was validated (C-Index 0.70) and the addition of plasma AR (C-Index 0.79; p < 0.001) increased its prognostic ability. We generated a parsimonious model including alkaline phosphatase (ALP); PSA and AR gain (C-index 0.78) that was validated in an independent cohort. Conclusions: TMPRSS2-ERG detection did not correlate with differential activity of enzalutamide in first-line mCRPC. However, we observed that CTCs and plasma AR gain were the most relevant biomarkers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-384
Number of pages9
JournalProstate
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge all the staff at SOGUG for their support to run the PREMIERE trial, Astellas for supporting this research, ISCIII from the Spanish Ministry of Health, and Cris Cancer Foundation for their support. This trial was promoted by SOGUG and received a grant from Astellas. EGB received a travel grant (BA16/00038) and funding support from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (PI18/00883) and support from SEOM-CRIS Cancer Foundation.

Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge all the staff at SOGUG for their support to run the PREMIERE trial, Astellas for supporting this research, ISCIII from the Spanish Ministry of Health, and Cris Cancer Foundation for their support. This trial was promoted by SOGUG and received a grant from Astellas. EGB received a travel grant (BA16/00038) and funding support from the “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” (PI18/00883) and support from SEOM‐CRIS Cancer Foundation.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • AR gain
  • AR-V7
  • CTCs
  • TMPRSS2-ERG
  • enzalutamide
  • prostate cancer

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A correlative biomarker study and integrative prognostic model in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with enzalutamide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this