Abstract
The relationship between general cognitive ability (GCA) and overall job performance has been a longaccepted fact in industrial and organizational psychology. However, the most prominent data on this relationship date back more than 50 years. This meta-analysis examines the relationship between GCA and overall job performance using studies from the current century. Results across 153 samples and a total sample size of 40,740 show a mean observed validity of.16, with a residual SD of.09. Correcting for unreliability in the criterion and correcting predictive studies for range restriction produces a mean corrected validity of.22 and a residual SD of.11. While this is a much smaller estimate than the.51 value offered by Schmidt and Hunter (1998), that value has been critiqued by Sackett et al. (2022), who offered a mean corrected validity of.31 based on integrating findings from prior meta-analyses of 20th century data. We obtain a lower value (.22) for 21st century data. We conclude that GCA is related to job performance, but our estimate of the magnitude of the relationship is lower than prior estimates.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 687-713 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 7 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 American Psychological Association
Keywords
- cognitive ability
- job performance
- meta-analysis
- validity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Contemporary Look at the Relationship Between General Cognitive Ability and Job Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS