Abstract
The relationship between general cognitive ability (GCA) and overall job performance has been a longaccepted fact in industrial and organizational psychology. However, the most prominent data on this relationship date back more than 50 years. This meta-analysis examines the relationship between GCA and overall job performance using studies from the current century. Results across 153 samples and a total sample size of 40,740 show a mean observed validity of.16, with a residual SD of.09. Correcting for unreliability in the criterion and correcting predictive studies for range restriction produces a mean corrected validity of.22 and a residual SD of.11. While this is a much smaller estimate than the.51 value offered by Schmidt and Hunter (1998), that value has been critiqued by Sackett et al. (2022), who offered a mean corrected validity of.31 based on integrating findings from prior meta-analyses of 20th century data. We obtain a lower value (.22) for 21st century data. We conclude that GCA is related to job performance, but our estimate of the magnitude of the relationship is lower than prior estimates.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 687-713 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 7 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 American Psychological Association
Keywords
- cognitive ability
- job performance
- meta-analysis
- validity
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
- Meta-Analysis