A confrontational naming task produces congruent increases and decreases in PET and fMRI

John R. Votaw; Tracy L. Faber; Carol A. Popp; Thomas R. Henry; Jon D. Trudeau; John L. Woodard; Hui Mao; John M. Hoffman; Allen W. Song

doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0471

A confrontational naming task produces congruent increases and decreases in PET and fMRI

John R. Votaw, Tracy L. Faber, Carol A. Popp, Thomas R. Henry, Jon D. Trudeau, John L. Woodard, Hui Mao, John M. Hoffman, Allen W. Song

Neurology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

This work uses the well-established (by PET) confrontation naming task to compare PET and fMRI in a cognitive activation experiment. The signal changes from this task are much less than the changes caused by visual or motor activation tasks used in previous comparisons. ANOVA methods adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to determine significant changes in signal between confrontation naming and figure size discrimination tasks. All 17 significantly increased regions (confrontation naming signal greater) seen on one modality were increased on both modalities. Ten of 13 regions that were significantly decreased on one modality were decreased on the other. Three mismatched regions showed a significant decrease on one modality and a nonsignificant increase on the other. This study could not detect a consistent difference in activation site location between PET and fMRI.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	347-356
Number of pages	10
Journal	NeuroImage
Volume	10
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0471
State	Published - Oct 1999

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful discussions and review of the manuscript by Roger P. Woods of the Neurology department of UCLA. The PET portions of this work were supported by NIH Grant MH53467 and the Emory University center for PET. The authors also acknowledge Egleston children’s Hospital for use of the MRI scanner, the Fritz Phillips Center for assistance, and the University Research Council of Emory University.

Publisher link

10.1006/nimg.1999.0471

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{22e51ce08afe458d9e13c90c9798bc98,

title = "A confrontational naming task produces congruent increases and decreases in PET and fMRI",

abstract = "This work uses the well-established (by PET) confrontation naming task to compare PET and fMRI in a cognitive activation experiment. The signal changes from this task are much less than the changes caused by visual or motor activation tasks used in previous comparisons. ANOVA methods adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to determine significant changes in signal between confrontation naming and figure size discrimination tasks. All 17 significantly increased regions (confrontation naming signal greater) seen on one modality were increased on both modalities. Ten of 13 regions that were significantly decreased on one modality were decreased on the other. Three mismatched regions showed a significant decrease on one modality and a nonsignificant increase on the other. This study could not detect a consistent difference in activation site location between PET and fMRI.",

author = "Votaw, {John R.} and Faber, {Tracy L.} and Popp, {Carol A.} and Henry, {Thomas R.} and Trudeau, {Jon D.} and Woodard, {John L.} and Hui Mao and Hoffman, {John M.} and Song, {Allen W.}",

note = "Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful discussions and review of the manuscript by Roger P. Woods of the Neurology department of UCLA. The PET portions of this work were supported by NIH Grant MH53467 and the Emory University center for PET. The authors also acknowledge Egleston children{\textquoteright}s Hospital for use of the MRI scanner, the Fritz Phillips Center for assistance, and the University Research Council of Emory University.",

year = "1999",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1006/nimg.1999.0471",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "10",

pages = "347--356",

journal = "NeuroImage",

issn = "1053-8119",

publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A confrontational naming task produces congruent increases and decreases in PET and fMRI

AU - Votaw, John R.

AU - Faber, Tracy L.

AU - Popp, Carol A.

AU - Henry, Thomas R.

AU - Trudeau, Jon D.

AU - Woodard, John L.

AU - Mao, Hui

AU - Hoffman, John M.

AU - Song, Allen W.

N1 - Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful discussions and review of the manuscript by Roger P. Woods of the Neurology department of UCLA. The PET portions of this work were supported by NIH Grant MH53467 and the Emory University center for PET. The authors also acknowledge Egleston children’s Hospital for use of the MRI scanner, the Fritz Phillips Center for assistance, and the University Research Council of Emory University.

PY - 1999/10

Y1 - 1999/10

N2 - This work uses the well-established (by PET) confrontation naming task to compare PET and fMRI in a cognitive activation experiment. The signal changes from this task are much less than the changes caused by visual or motor activation tasks used in previous comparisons. ANOVA methods adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to determine significant changes in signal between confrontation naming and figure size discrimination tasks. All 17 significantly increased regions (confrontation naming signal greater) seen on one modality were increased on both modalities. Ten of 13 regions that were significantly decreased on one modality were decreased on the other. Three mismatched regions showed a significant decrease on one modality and a nonsignificant increase on the other. This study could not detect a consistent difference in activation site location between PET and fMRI.

AB - This work uses the well-established (by PET) confrontation naming task to compare PET and fMRI in a cognitive activation experiment. The signal changes from this task are much less than the changes caused by visual or motor activation tasks used in previous comparisons. ANOVA methods adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to determine significant changes in signal between confrontation naming and figure size discrimination tasks. All 17 significantly increased regions (confrontation naming signal greater) seen on one modality were increased on both modalities. Ten of 13 regions that were significantly decreased on one modality were decreased on the other. Three mismatched regions showed a significant decrease on one modality and a nonsignificant increase on the other. This study could not detect a consistent difference in activation site location between PET and fMRI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032824082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032824082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/nimg.1999.0471

DO - 10.1006/nimg.1999.0471

M3 - Article

C2 - 10493894

AN - SCOPUS:0032824082

SN - 1053-8119

VL - 10

SP - 347

EP - 356

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

IS - 4

ER -

A confrontational naming task produces congruent increases and decreases in PET and fMRI

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this