A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance

Nathan R Kuncel, Deniz S Ones, Sarah A. Hezlett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

334 Scopus citations

Abstract

This meta-analysis examined the validity of the Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) as predictors of graduate school performance. The study included samples from multiple disciplines, considered different criterion measures, and corrected for statistical artifacts. Data from 1,753 independent samples were included in the meta-analysis, yielding 6,589 correlations for 8 different criteria and 82,659 graduate students. The results indicated that the GRE and UGPA are generalizably valid predictors of graduate grade point average, 1st-year graduate grade point average, comprehensive examination scores, publication citation counts, and faculty ratings. GRE correlations with degree attainment and research productivity were consistently positive; however, some lower 90% credibility intervals included 0. Subject Tests tended to be better predictors than the Verbal, Quantitative, and Analytical tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-181
Number of pages20
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume127
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this