A comparison of West Nile virus transmission by Ochlerotatus trivittatus (COQ.), Culex pipiens (L.), and Aedes albopictus (Skuse)

Sonthaya Tiawsirisup, Kenneth B. Platt, Richard B. Evans, Wayne A. Rowley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transmission of West Nile virus (WNV) by Ochlerotatus trivittatus, Culex pipiens, and Aedes albopictus were compared 14 days after taking blood meals from viremic chickens with titers ranging from 102.5 to 109.5 cell infective dose 50s (CID50s)/mL serum. Transmission occurred in one of four (25%) Oc. trivittatus and one of 25 (4%) Cx. pipiens that fed on chickens with titers of 105.5 CID50s/mL. No transmission occurred among two of 16 (13%) Oc. trivittatus or one of 25 (4%) Cx. pipiens that became infected after blood meals with titers of 105.0 and 104.5 CID50s/mL, the next lowest blood meal titers evaluated. Seventeen of 28 (61%) Ae. albopictus transmitted WNV after blood meals with titers of 107.0 CID50s/mL, but no infection or transmission was observed among 21 Ae. albopictus that fed on chickens with titers of 105.0 CID50s/mL, the next lowest titer evaluated. Transmission by all three species increased dramatically after blood meals with WNV titers of ≥105.5 CID50s/mL. No significant differences occurred in dissemination and transmission rates of the three species after taking blood meals with titers of >107.0 CID50s/mL. The cumulative mean ± SE transmission rates of Oc. trivittatus, Cx. pipiens, and Ae. albopictus after blood meals with titers of ≥107.0 CID50s/mL were 45.5 ± 4.1%, 46.8 ± 4.5%, and 72.4 ± 5.5%. The cumulative mean dissemination rates of the three species were 78.3 ± 6.7%, 74.8 ± 2.6%, and 88.6 ± 2.1%. The rates of transmission by the three species that developed disseminated infections after blood meals with titers of ≥107.0 CID50s/mL were 58.8 ± 4.4%, 62.6 ± 5.8%, and 81.6 ± 5.4%, respectively. In a previous study, we found that susceptibility of the three species to WNV was essentially the same when fed on chickens with WNV titers of >107.0 CID50s/mL, but Oc. trivittatus and Cx. pipiens were more susceptible than Ae. albopictus to WNV at lower virus titers. The current study strongly suggests that Ae. albopictus is a more efficient vector than Oc. trivittatus and Cx. pipiens when fed blood meals with titers of >107.0 CID50s/mL. However, Oc. trivittatus and Cx. pipiens might be more efficient as vectors when infected by blood meals with titers of <107.0 CID50s/mL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-47
Number of pages8
JournalVector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aedes albopictus
  • Culex pipiens
  • Ochlerotatus trivittatus
  • Transmission
  • Vector competence
  • West Nile virus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of West Nile virus transmission by Ochlerotatus trivittatus (COQ.), Culex pipiens (L.), and Aedes albopictus (Skuse)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this