A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses

Daniel H. Dunn; Phillip Robbins; Cezar Decanini; Stanley Goldberg; John P. Delaney

doi:10.1007/BF02586416

A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses

Daniel H. Dunn, Phillip Robbins, Cezar Decanini, Stanley Goldberg, John P. Delaney

Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Critical experimental evaluation of the stapled anastomosis indicates that it is not as secure as the inverted one-layer anastomosis. The clinical application of this observation may be that the everted stapling method should not be used in an extraperitoneal anastomosis or in the presence of adverse conditions such as infection, radiation enteritis, or inflammatory bowel disease.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	636-639
Number of pages	4
Journal	Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Volume	21
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586416
State	Published - Nov 1 1978

Publisher link

10.1007/BF02586416

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{716ebce0e4004ab9b292a7b4217a3bcd,

title = "A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses",

abstract = "Critical experimental evaluation of the stapled anastomosis indicates that it is not as secure as the inverted one-layer anastomosis. The clinical application of this observation may be that the everted stapling method should not be used in an extraperitoneal anastomosis or in the presence of adverse conditions such as infection, radiation enteritis, or inflammatory bowel disease.",

author = "Dunn, {Daniel H.} and Phillip Robbins and Cezar Decanini and Stanley Goldberg and Delaney, {John P.}",

year = "1978",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/BF02586416",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "21",

pages = "636--639",

journal = "Diseases of the Colon & Rectum",

issn = "0012-3706",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses

AU - Dunn, Daniel H.

AU - Robbins, Phillip

AU - Decanini, Cezar

AU - Goldberg, Stanley

AU - Delaney, John P.

PY - 1978/11/1

Y1 - 1978/11/1

N2 - Critical experimental evaluation of the stapled anastomosis indicates that it is not as secure as the inverted one-layer anastomosis. The clinical application of this observation may be that the everted stapling method should not be used in an extraperitoneal anastomosis or in the presence of adverse conditions such as infection, radiation enteritis, or inflammatory bowel disease.

AB - Critical experimental evaluation of the stapled anastomosis indicates that it is not as secure as the inverted one-layer anastomosis. The clinical application of this observation may be that the everted stapling method should not be used in an extraperitoneal anastomosis or in the presence of adverse conditions such as infection, radiation enteritis, or inflammatory bowel disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018222973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018222973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02586416

DO - 10.1007/BF02586416

M3 - Article

C2 - 367736

AN - SCOPUS:0018222973

SN - 0012-3706

VL - 21

SP - 636

EP - 639

JO - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

IS - 8

ER -

A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses

Abstract

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this