A comparison of self-help approaches to smoking cessation

Harry A Lando, Phyllis L. Pirie, Paul G. McGovern, Terry F. Pechacek, Janet Swim, Barbara Loken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current study evaluated the effectiveness of widely used self-help materials for quitting smoking. Five hundred and seventy smokers volunteered during a baseline survey to participate in the evaluation. After random assignment, 200 were mailed National Cancer Institute (NCI) "Quit for Good" materials, 200 the Minnesota "Quit and Win" program, and the remaining 170 were assigned to a nonintervention control condition. Results at 7-month follow-up failed to indicate treatment effects either for abstinence or for reported quit attempts. A number of smokers quit prior to the mailing of self-help materials, suggesting that a telephone prompt in itself may have been an important stimulus to cessation. Overall abstinence at follow-up was 10%. Contrary to expectation, successful participants were less likely to use a number of specific preparation strategies for quitting. The results are instructive in providing a large-scale assessment of self-help materials in a population of smokers that was not specifically seeking treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-193
Number of pages11
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (lRO1 HL25523). Reprint requests should be sent to Harry A. Lando, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, l-210 MOOS Tower, 515 Delaware Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of self-help approaches to smoking cessation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this