A comparison of analysis of variance and correlation methods for investigating cognitive development with functional magnetic resonance imaging

Damien A. Fair, Timothy T. Brown, Steven E. Petersen, Bradley L. Schlaggar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Statistical approaches used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study cognitive development are varied and evolving. Two approaches have generally been used. These are between-group end-point analysis of variance (ANOVA) and age-related regression. Differences in these 2 approaches could produce different results when applied to a single data set. Event-related fMRI data from a group of typically developing participants (n = 95; age range = 7-35 years) performing controlled lexical processing tasks were analyzed using both methods. Results from the 2 approaches showed significant overlap, but also noteworthy differences. The results suggest that for regions showing age-related changes, correlation was relatively more sensitive to more linear changes whereas ANOVA was relatively more sensitive to less-linear changes. These findings suggest that full characterization of developmental dynamics will require converging methodologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-546
Number of pages16
JournalDevelopmental Neuropsychology
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of analysis of variance and correlation methods for investigating cognitive development with functional magnetic resonance imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this