A comparative evaluation of fibreoptic bronchoscopy versus C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery patients

Abhishek Kumar, Nishkarsh Gupta, Tanvi Bhargava, Anju Gupta, Vinod Kumar, Sachidanand Jee Bharti, Rakesh Garg, Seema Mishra, Sushma Bhatnagar, Rajeev K. Malhotra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is required for surgery in oropharyngeal (OP) carcinoma patients, but it may be challenging because of distorted anatomy, mucosal congestion, and increased risk of bleeding. Flexible bronchoscopy (FB)-guided NTI is preferred in these cases but has limitations. In this randomized controlled study, we sought to compare C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy (VL) (Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) with FB for NTI under general anesthesia in patients with OP carcinomas. Methods: We randomized a total of 100 patients with OP carcinoma and El-Ganzouri’s risk index (EGRI) < 7 to undergo NTI under general anesthesia with FB (n = 50) or C-MAC D-BLADE-guided VL (n = 50). The primary outcome was the total intubation time. We also recorded the time to glottis view, nasal intubation difficulty scale (NIDS) score, best percentage of glottis opening score, and complications. Results: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] total intubation time was shorter with VL than with FB (total intubation time, 38 [26–43] sec vs 60 [52–65] sec; difference, −20 sec [95% confidence interval (CI), −27 to −11]; P < 0.001). Similarly, the median [IQR] time to glottis view was shorter with VL compared to FB (8 [6–9] sec vs 22 [14–25] sec; difference, −13 sec [95% CI, −17 to −10]; P < 0.001). The median NIDS score was higher with VL (difference, 2 [95% CI, 2 to 3]; P < 0.001). The incidences of airway trauma (two cases with FB vs seven with VL; P = 0.30) and postoperative sore throat (ten cases in both groups; P = 0.56) were similar. Conclusion: Compared to FB, C-MAC D-BLADE-based VL reduced the total time for nasal intubation oropharyngeal carcinoma patients, potentially representing an acceptable alternative in selected cases. Trial registration: CTRI.nic.in (2018/11/0162830); first submitted 8 November 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-510
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2024.

Keywords

  • C-MAC
  • difficult airway
  • nasotracheal intubation
  • oropharyngeal carcinoma
  • videolaryngoscope
  • videolaryngoscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative evaluation of fibreoptic bronchoscopy versus C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this