TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative evaluation of fibreoptic bronchoscopy versus C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery patients
AU - Kumar, Abhishek
AU - Gupta, Nishkarsh
AU - Bhargava, Tanvi
AU - Gupta, Anju
AU - Kumar, Vinod
AU - Bharti, Sachidanand Jee
AU - Garg, Rakesh
AU - Mishra, Seema
AU - Bhatnagar, Sushma
AU - Malhotra, Rajeev K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2024.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Purpose: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is required for surgery in oropharyngeal (OP) carcinoma patients, but it may be challenging because of distorted anatomy, mucosal congestion, and increased risk of bleeding. Flexible bronchoscopy (FB)-guided NTI is preferred in these cases but has limitations. In this randomized controlled study, we sought to compare C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy (VL) (Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) with FB for NTI under general anesthesia in patients with OP carcinomas. Methods: We randomized a total of 100 patients with OP carcinoma and El-Ganzouri’s risk index (EGRI) < 7 to undergo NTI under general anesthesia with FB (n = 50) or C-MAC D-BLADE-guided VL (n = 50). The primary outcome was the total intubation time. We also recorded the time to glottis view, nasal intubation difficulty scale (NIDS) score, best percentage of glottis opening score, and complications. Results: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] total intubation time was shorter with VL than with FB (total intubation time, 38 [26–43] sec vs 60 [52–65] sec; difference, −20 sec [95% confidence interval (CI), −27 to −11]; P < 0.001). Similarly, the median [IQR] time to glottis view was shorter with VL compared to FB (8 [6–9] sec vs 22 [14–25] sec; difference, −13 sec [95% CI, −17 to −10]; P < 0.001). The median NIDS score was higher with VL (difference, 2 [95% CI, 2 to 3]; P < 0.001). The incidences of airway trauma (two cases with FB vs seven with VL; P = 0.30) and postoperative sore throat (ten cases in both groups; P = 0.56) were similar. Conclusion: Compared to FB, C-MAC D-BLADE-based VL reduced the total time for nasal intubation oropharyngeal carcinoma patients, potentially representing an acceptable alternative in selected cases. Trial registration: CTRI.nic.in (2018/11/0162830); first submitted 8 November 2018.
AB - Purpose: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is required for surgery in oropharyngeal (OP) carcinoma patients, but it may be challenging because of distorted anatomy, mucosal congestion, and increased risk of bleeding. Flexible bronchoscopy (FB)-guided NTI is preferred in these cases but has limitations. In this randomized controlled study, we sought to compare C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy (VL) (Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) with FB for NTI under general anesthesia in patients with OP carcinomas. Methods: We randomized a total of 100 patients with OP carcinoma and El-Ganzouri’s risk index (EGRI) < 7 to undergo NTI under general anesthesia with FB (n = 50) or C-MAC D-BLADE-guided VL (n = 50). The primary outcome was the total intubation time. We also recorded the time to glottis view, nasal intubation difficulty scale (NIDS) score, best percentage of glottis opening score, and complications. Results: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] total intubation time was shorter with VL than with FB (total intubation time, 38 [26–43] sec vs 60 [52–65] sec; difference, −20 sec [95% confidence interval (CI), −27 to −11]; P < 0.001). Similarly, the median [IQR] time to glottis view was shorter with VL compared to FB (8 [6–9] sec vs 22 [14–25] sec; difference, −13 sec [95% CI, −17 to −10]; P < 0.001). The median NIDS score was higher with VL (difference, 2 [95% CI, 2 to 3]; P < 0.001). The incidences of airway trauma (two cases with FB vs seven with VL; P = 0.30) and postoperative sore throat (ten cases in both groups; P = 0.56) were similar. Conclusion: Compared to FB, C-MAC D-BLADE-based VL reduced the total time for nasal intubation oropharyngeal carcinoma patients, potentially representing an acceptable alternative in selected cases. Trial registration: CTRI.nic.in (2018/11/0162830); first submitted 8 November 2018.
KW - C-MAC
KW - difficult airway
KW - nasotracheal intubation
KW - oropharyngeal carcinoma
KW - videolaryngoscope
KW - videolaryngoscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182719780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182719780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12630-023-02687-w
DO - 10.1007/s12630-023-02687-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 38243098
AN - SCOPUS:85182719780
SN - 0832-610X
VL - 71
SP - 503
EP - 510
JO - Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
JF - Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
IS - 4
ER -