Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A common longitudinal intensive care unit data format (CLIF) for critical illness research

  • Juan C. Rojas
  • , Patrick G. Lyons
  • , Kaveri Chhikara
  • , Vaishvik Chaudhari
  • , Sivasubramanium V. Bhavani
  • , Muna Nour
  • , Kevin G. Buell
  • , Kevin D. Smith
  • , Catherine A. Gao
  • , Saki Amagai
  • , Chengsheng Mao
  • , Yuan Luo
  • , Anna K. Barker
  • , Mark Nuppnau
  • , Michael Hermsen
  • , Jay L. Koyner
  • , Haley Beck
  • , Rachel Baccile
  • , Zewei Liao
  • , Kyle A. Carey
  • Brenna Park-Egan, Xuan Han, Alexander C. Ortiz, Benjamin E. Schmid, Gary E. Weissman, Chad H. Hochberg, Nicholas E. Ingraham, William F. Parker

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Rationale: Critical illness threatens millions of lives annually. Electronic health record (EHR) data are a source of granular information that could generate crucial insights into the nature and optimal treatment of critical illness. Objectives: Overcome the data management, security, and standardization barriers to large-scale critical illness EHR studies. Methods: We developed a Common Longitudinal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) data Format (CLIF), an open-source database format to harmonize EHR data necessary to study critical illness. We conducted proof-of-concept studies with a federated research architecture: (1) an external validation of an in-hospital mortality prediction model for critically ill patients and (2) an assessment of 72-h temperature trajectories and their association with mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality using group-based trajectory models. Measurements and main results: We converted longitudinal data from 111,440 critically ill patient admissions from 2020 to 2021 (mean age 60.7 years [standard deviation 17.1], 28% Black, 7% Hispanic, 44% female) across 9 health systems and 39 hospitals into CLIF databases. The in-hospital mortality prediction model had varying performance across CLIF consortium sites (AUCs: 0.73–0.81, Brier scores: 0.06–0.10) with degradation in performance relative to the derivation site. Temperature trajectories were similar across health systems. Hypothermic and hyperthermic-slow-resolver patients consistently had the highest mortality. Conclusions: CLIF enables transparent, efficient, and reproducible critical care research across diverse health systems. Our federated case studies showcase CLIF’s potential for disease sub-phenotyping and clinical decision-support evaluation. Future applications include pragmatic EHR-based trials, target trial emulations, foundational artificial intelligence (AI) models of critical illness, and real-time critical care quality dashboards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number160035
Pages (from-to)556-569
Number of pages14
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.

Keywords

  • Critical care data
  • Machine learning
  • Temperature trajectory modeling

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A common longitudinal intensive care unit data format (CLIF) for critical illness research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this