Abstract
Multiple regression has been widely used to apportion particle light scattering among distinct chemical species. The resulting scattering budgets are shown here to be unbiased estimates under certain theoretical conditions. The theory allows species' particle size distributions and water uptakes to vary from sample to sample, as they are known to do in reality. The sole constraint is that variations in each species' characteristics be statistically independent of all species' concentrations. Individual violations of this condition cause identifiable biases, and multiple violations can offset each other to yield regression estimates that are accurate by accident. Detailed and summary accountings of statistical errors are illustrated using a mechanistic model derived from measurements in southern California. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 151-158 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Atmospheric Environment |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research benefited from the encouragement of Pradeep Saxena, project manager of supporting PRI contracts with Washington University and the University of Minnesota. The paper has also benefited from unusually helpful reviewer comments.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Aerosols
- Estimation
- Radiative forcing
- Scattering efficiency
- Southern California Air Quality Study (SCAQS)
- Visibility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A closure study of extinction apportionment by multiple regression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS