A Case Discussion on Market-Based Extended Producer Responsibility: The Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act

Işıl Alev, Ximin (Natalie) Huang, Atalay Atasu, L. Beril Toktay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act to explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of a market-based extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation implementation with operational flexibility for manufacturers. Based on publicly available reports and stakeholder interviews, we find that the Minnesota Act attains two key goals of market-based EPR (i.e., higher cost efficiencies and substantial landfill diversion); however, this may come at the expense of selective collection and recycling, an increased burden on local governments, and a loss of balance in contractual power between stakeholders. We observe that these concerns arise because of specific flexibility provisions afforded to manufacturers that allow them to operationalize their EPR compliance with a cost-efficiency focus. Thus, we conclude that EPR goals must be carefully translated into operating rules in order to achieve goals while avoiding unintended consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)208-221
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work received partial funding from the National Science Foundation, Division of Design and Manufacturing Innovation (NSF-DMI) grant number 1031167. The opinions expressed in this article and any associated mistakes are the authors’ own.

Keywords

  • State of Minnesota
  • e-waste
  • electrical and electronic equipment
  • environmental policy
  • extended producer responsibility (EPR)
  • industrial ecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Case Discussion on Market-Based Extended Producer Responsibility: The Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this