Abstract
In this article, we analyze the Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act to explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of a market-based extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation implementation with operational flexibility for manufacturers. Based on publicly available reports and stakeholder interviews, we find that the Minnesota Act attains two key goals of market-based EPR (i.e., higher cost efficiencies and substantial landfill diversion); however, this may come at the expense of selective collection and recycling, an increased burden on local governments, and a loss of balance in contractual power between stakeholders. We observe that these concerns arise because of specific flexibility provisions afforded to manufacturers that allow them to operationalize their EPR compliance with a cost-efficiency focus. Thus, we conclude that EPR goals must be carefully translated into operating rules in order to achieve goals while avoiding unintended consequences.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 208-221 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Industrial Ecology |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2019 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- State of Minnesota
- e-waste
- electrical and electronic equipment
- environmental policy
- extended producer responsibility (EPR)
- industrial ecology
Cite this
A Case Discussion on Market-Based Extended Producer Responsibility : The Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act. / Alev, Işıl; Huang, Ximin (Natalie); Atasu, Atalay; Toktay, L. Beril.
In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 208-221.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A Case Discussion on Market-Based Extended Producer Responsibility
T2 - The Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act
AU - Alev, Işıl
AU - Huang, Ximin (Natalie)
AU - Atasu, Atalay
AU - Toktay, L. Beril
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - In this article, we analyze the Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act to explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of a market-based extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation implementation with operational flexibility for manufacturers. Based on publicly available reports and stakeholder interviews, we find that the Minnesota Act attains two key goals of market-based EPR (i.e., higher cost efficiencies and substantial landfill diversion); however, this may come at the expense of selective collection and recycling, an increased burden on local governments, and a loss of balance in contractual power between stakeholders. We observe that these concerns arise because of specific flexibility provisions afforded to manufacturers that allow them to operationalize their EPR compliance with a cost-efficiency focus. Thus, we conclude that EPR goals must be carefully translated into operating rules in order to achieve goals while avoiding unintended consequences.
AB - In this article, we analyze the Minnesota Electronics Recycling Act to explore the benefits and potential drawbacks of a market-based extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation implementation with operational flexibility for manufacturers. Based on publicly available reports and stakeholder interviews, we find that the Minnesota Act attains two key goals of market-based EPR (i.e., higher cost efficiencies and substantial landfill diversion); however, this may come at the expense of selective collection and recycling, an increased burden on local governments, and a loss of balance in contractual power between stakeholders. We observe that these concerns arise because of specific flexibility provisions afforded to manufacturers that allow them to operationalize their EPR compliance with a cost-efficiency focus. Thus, we conclude that EPR goals must be carefully translated into operating rules in order to achieve goals while avoiding unintended consequences.
KW - State of Minnesota
KW - e-waste
KW - electrical and electronic equipment
KW - environmental policy
KW - extended producer responsibility (EPR)
KW - industrial ecology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041071356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041071356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jiec.12721
DO - 10.1111/jiec.12721
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85041071356
VL - 23
SP - 208
EP - 221
JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology
JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology
SN - 1088-1980
IS - 1
ER -