A call to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors courses

Cissy J. Ballen, Jessamina E. Blum, Sara Brownell, Sadie Hebert, James Hewlett, Joanna R. Klein, Erik A. McDonald, Denise L. Monti, Stephen C. Nold, Krista E. Slemmons, Paula A.G. Soneral, Sehoya Cotner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non–science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCBE Life Sciences Education
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Research
experience
Practice Guidelines
best practice
Learning
Mathematics
learning objective
working group
science
Decision Making
Education
Decision making
literacy
mathematics
Students
engineering
Technology
decision making
learning
evidence

Cite this

A call to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors courses. / Ballen, Cissy J.; Blum, Jessamina E.; Brownell, Sara; Hebert, Sadie; Hewlett, James; Klein, Joanna R.; McDonald, Erik A.; Monti, Denise L.; Nold, Stephen C.; Slemmons, Krista E.; Soneral, Paula A.G.; Cotner, Sehoya.

In: CBE Life Sciences Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ballen, CJ, Blum, JE, Brownell, S, Hebert, S, Hewlett, J, Klein, JR, McDonald, EA, Monti, DL, Nold, SC, Slemmons, KE, Soneral, PAG & Cotner, S 2017, 'A call to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors courses' CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352
Ballen, Cissy J. ; Blum, Jessamina E. ; Brownell, Sara ; Hebert, Sadie ; Hewlett, James ; Klein, Joanna R. ; McDonald, Erik A. ; Monti, Denise L. ; Nold, Stephen C. ; Slemmons, Krista E. ; Soneral, Paula A.G. ; Cotner, Sehoya. / A call to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors courses. In: CBE Life Sciences Education. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 2.
@article{b8c488d9ba1d478a98ffdeb0a0f9fb31,
title = "A call to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors courses",
abstract = "Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non–science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.",
author = "Ballen, {Cissy J.} and Blum, {Jessamina E.} and Sara Brownell and Sadie Hebert and James Hewlett and Klein, {Joanna R.} and McDonald, {Erik A.} and Monti, {Denise L.} and Nold, {Stephen C.} and Slemmons, {Krista E.} and Soneral, {Paula A.G.} and Sehoya Cotner",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A call to develop course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors courses

AU - Ballen, Cissy J.

AU - Blum, Jessamina E.

AU - Brownell, Sara

AU - Hebert, Sadie

AU - Hewlett, James

AU - Klein, Joanna R.

AU - McDonald, Erik A.

AU - Monti, Denise L.

AU - Nold, Stephen C.

AU - Slemmons, Krista E.

AU - Soneral, Paula A.G.

AU - Cotner, Sehoya

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non–science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.

AB - Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) for non–science majors (nonmajors) are potentially distinct from CUREs for developing scientists in their goals, learning objectives, and assessment strategies. While national calls to improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education have led to an increase in research revealing the positive effects of CUREs for science majors, less work has specifically examined whether nonmajors are impacted in the same way. To address this gap in our understanding, a working group focused on nonmajors CUREs was convened to discuss the following questions: 1) What are our laboratory-learning goals for nonmajors? 2) What are our research priorities to determine best practices for nonmajors CUREs? 3) How can we collaborate to define and disseminate best practices for nonmajors in CUREs? We defined three broad student outcomes of prime importance to the nonmajors CURE: improvement of scientific literacy skills, proscience attitudes, and evidence-based decision making. We evaluated the state of knowledge of best practices for nonmajors, and identified research priorities for the future. The report that follows is a summary of the conclusions and future directions from our discussion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018271669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018271669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352

DO - 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0352

M3 - Article

VL - 16

JO - CBE Life Sciences Education

JF - CBE Life Sciences Education

SN - 1931-7913

IS - 2

ER -