A Better “Best Interests”: Immigration Policy in a Comparative Context

Michele Statz, Lauren Heidbrink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This conceptual article examines the role and limitations of the best interests standard in international and domestic policy, with a particular focus on how the standard is implicated in the treatment of unaccompanied minors in the United States. Motivated by emergent interdisciplinary scholarship on global youth and informed by a comparative consideration of best interests across other professions, we propose a new model of best interests. This model calls for a multidimensional recognition of youths’ family-, community- and decision-making contexts; acknowledgment of youths’ rights; and a commitment to speaking with, rather than for, young people. What results is a novel and dynamic understanding of best interests with relevance to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-386
Number of pages22
JournalLaw and Policy
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2019

Fingerprint

immigration policy
domestic policy
speaking
profession
commitment
decision making
community

Cite this

A Better “Best Interests” : Immigration Policy in a Comparative Context. / Statz, Michele; Heidbrink, Lauren.

In: Law and Policy, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 365-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af0f1991fbfe4409861aa26774233f53,
title = "A Better “Best Interests”: Immigration Policy in a Comparative Context",
abstract = "This conceptual article examines the role and limitations of the best interests standard in international and domestic policy, with a particular focus on how the standard is implicated in the treatment of unaccompanied minors in the United States. Motivated by emergent interdisciplinary scholarship on global youth and informed by a comparative consideration of best interests across other professions, we propose a new model of best interests. This model calls for a multidimensional recognition of youths’ family-, community- and decision-making contexts; acknowledgment of youths’ rights; and a commitment to speaking with, rather than for, young people. What results is a novel and dynamic understanding of best interests with relevance to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.",
author = "Michele Statz and Lauren Heidbrink",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lapo.12135",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "365--386",
journal = "Law and Policy",
issn = "0265-8240",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Better “Best Interests”

T2 - Immigration Policy in a Comparative Context

AU - Statz, Michele

AU - Heidbrink, Lauren

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - This conceptual article examines the role and limitations of the best interests standard in international and domestic policy, with a particular focus on how the standard is implicated in the treatment of unaccompanied minors in the United States. Motivated by emergent interdisciplinary scholarship on global youth and informed by a comparative consideration of best interests across other professions, we propose a new model of best interests. This model calls for a multidimensional recognition of youths’ family-, community- and decision-making contexts; acknowledgment of youths’ rights; and a commitment to speaking with, rather than for, young people. What results is a novel and dynamic understanding of best interests with relevance to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.

AB - This conceptual article examines the role and limitations of the best interests standard in international and domestic policy, with a particular focus on how the standard is implicated in the treatment of unaccompanied minors in the United States. Motivated by emergent interdisciplinary scholarship on global youth and informed by a comparative consideration of best interests across other professions, we propose a new model of best interests. This model calls for a multidimensional recognition of youths’ family-, community- and decision-making contexts; acknowledgment of youths’ rights; and a commitment to speaking with, rather than for, young people. What results is a novel and dynamic understanding of best interests with relevance to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075051044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075051044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/lapo.12135

DO - 10.1111/lapo.12135

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85075051044

VL - 41

SP - 365

EP - 386

JO - Law and Policy

JF - Law and Policy

SN - 0265-8240

IS - 4

ER -