4. Biomechanical evaluation of the Pinless external fixator

G. Moe Stene, R. Frigg, U. Schlegel, M. Swiontkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In open fractures especially in those with severe soft tissue damage, fracture stabilisation is best achieved by using external fixators. There are some intrinsic complications which occur during classical external pin fixation. To overcome the problem of pin track infection and vascular damage from drilling, the Pinless external fixator was developed. It is based on the idea of a forceps with trocar points, which only penetrate the bone cortex superficially. The function of the device was tested in two mechanical trials and two in vitro tests in which one pinless clamp was put under a controlled load of 50 N, 150 cycles/day and studied over a 5 week period in sheep. The loads and time range of the experiment were chosen to simulate a temporary fracture stabilisation in a patient not bearing weight. The main question to be answered was whether the Pinless external fixator would be able to maintain stable fixation. Furthermore, it was to determine the changes at the trocar-to-bone interface. The clamp was found to maintain 72 % of the initially applied clamping force after 5 weeks of in vivo application and it was found to be tight at removal. Some decrease of clamping force was found during the first 20 days and then the force tended to level off. There was no slippage nor did the clamp penetrate the cortex. There were no obvious signs of infection around the trocar-holes and in the bacterial tests no pathological cultures were grown. Histology revealed very localised bone reactions, the indentation caused by the trocar tips being only 1.2 mm deep. The study concludes, as far as could be ascertained from these tests, that it is safe to use pinless external fixation for temporary fracture fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInjury
Volume23
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

External Fixators
Surgical Instruments
Bone and Bones
Constriction
Fracture Fixation
Open Fractures
Weight-Bearing
Infection
Blood Vessels
Sheep
Histology
Equipment and Supplies

Cite this

4. Biomechanical evaluation of the Pinless external fixator. / Stene, G. Moe; Frigg, R.; Schlegel, U.; Swiontkowski, M.

In: Injury, Vol. 23, No. SUPPL. 3, 01.01.1992.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stene, G. Moe ; Frigg, R. ; Schlegel, U. ; Swiontkowski, M. / 4. Biomechanical evaluation of the Pinless external fixator. In: Injury. 1992 ; Vol. 23, No. SUPPL. 3.
@article{26592c158ab84733b317b0d739397d53,
title = "4. Biomechanical evaluation of the Pinless external fixator",
abstract = "In open fractures especially in those with severe soft tissue damage, fracture stabilisation is best achieved by using external fixators. There are some intrinsic complications which occur during classical external pin fixation. To overcome the problem of pin track infection and vascular damage from drilling, the Pinless external fixator was developed. It is based on the idea of a forceps with trocar points, which only penetrate the bone cortex superficially. The function of the device was tested in two mechanical trials and two in vitro tests in which one pinless clamp was put under a controlled load of 50 N, 150 cycles/day and studied over a 5 week period in sheep. The loads and time range of the experiment were chosen to simulate a temporary fracture stabilisation in a patient not bearing weight. The main question to be answered was whether the Pinless external fixator would be able to maintain stable fixation. Furthermore, it was to determine the changes at the trocar-to-bone interface. The clamp was found to maintain 72 {\%} of the initially applied clamping force after 5 weeks of in vivo application and it was found to be tight at removal. Some decrease of clamping force was found during the first 20 days and then the force tended to level off. There was no slippage nor did the clamp penetrate the cortex. There were no obvious signs of infection around the trocar-holes and in the bacterial tests no pathological cultures were grown. Histology revealed very localised bone reactions, the indentation caused by the trocar tips being only 1.2 mm deep. The study concludes, as far as could be ascertained from these tests, that it is safe to use pinless external fixation for temporary fracture fixation.",
author = "Stene, {G. Moe} and R. Frigg and U. Schlegel and M. Swiontkowski",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0020-1383(92)90004-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
journal = "Injury",
issn = "0020-1383",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 4. Biomechanical evaluation of the Pinless external fixator

AU - Stene, G. Moe

AU - Frigg, R.

AU - Schlegel, U.

AU - Swiontkowski, M.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - In open fractures especially in those with severe soft tissue damage, fracture stabilisation is best achieved by using external fixators. There are some intrinsic complications which occur during classical external pin fixation. To overcome the problem of pin track infection and vascular damage from drilling, the Pinless external fixator was developed. It is based on the idea of a forceps with trocar points, which only penetrate the bone cortex superficially. The function of the device was tested in two mechanical trials and two in vitro tests in which one pinless clamp was put under a controlled load of 50 N, 150 cycles/day and studied over a 5 week period in sheep. The loads and time range of the experiment were chosen to simulate a temporary fracture stabilisation in a patient not bearing weight. The main question to be answered was whether the Pinless external fixator would be able to maintain stable fixation. Furthermore, it was to determine the changes at the trocar-to-bone interface. The clamp was found to maintain 72 % of the initially applied clamping force after 5 weeks of in vivo application and it was found to be tight at removal. Some decrease of clamping force was found during the first 20 days and then the force tended to level off. There was no slippage nor did the clamp penetrate the cortex. There were no obvious signs of infection around the trocar-holes and in the bacterial tests no pathological cultures were grown. Histology revealed very localised bone reactions, the indentation caused by the trocar tips being only 1.2 mm deep. The study concludes, as far as could be ascertained from these tests, that it is safe to use pinless external fixation for temporary fracture fixation.

AB - In open fractures especially in those with severe soft tissue damage, fracture stabilisation is best achieved by using external fixators. There are some intrinsic complications which occur during classical external pin fixation. To overcome the problem of pin track infection and vascular damage from drilling, the Pinless external fixator was developed. It is based on the idea of a forceps with trocar points, which only penetrate the bone cortex superficially. The function of the device was tested in two mechanical trials and two in vitro tests in which one pinless clamp was put under a controlled load of 50 N, 150 cycles/day and studied over a 5 week period in sheep. The loads and time range of the experiment were chosen to simulate a temporary fracture stabilisation in a patient not bearing weight. The main question to be answered was whether the Pinless external fixator would be able to maintain stable fixation. Furthermore, it was to determine the changes at the trocar-to-bone interface. The clamp was found to maintain 72 % of the initially applied clamping force after 5 weeks of in vivo application and it was found to be tight at removal. Some decrease of clamping force was found during the first 20 days and then the force tended to level off. There was no slippage nor did the clamp penetrate the cortex. There were no obvious signs of infection around the trocar-holes and in the bacterial tests no pathological cultures were grown. Histology revealed very localised bone reactions, the indentation caused by the trocar tips being only 1.2 mm deep. The study concludes, as far as could be ascertained from these tests, that it is safe to use pinless external fixation for temporary fracture fixation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027022524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027022524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90004-C

DO - 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90004-C

M3 - Article

VL - 23

JO - Injury

JF - Injury

SN - 0020-1383

IS - SUPPL. 3

ER -