TY - JOUR
T1 - 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering
T2 - current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation
AU - Agarwal, Tarun
AU - Onesto, Valentina
AU - Banerjee, Dishary
AU - Guo, Shengbo
AU - Polini, Alessandro
AU - Vogt, Caleb
AU - Viswanath, Abhishek
AU - Esworthy, Timothy
AU - Cui, Haitao
AU - O’Donnell, Aaron
AU - Vajanthri, Kiran Yellappa
AU - Moroni, Lorenzo
AU - Ozbolat, Ibrahim T.
AU - Panoskaltsis-Mortari, Angela
AU - Zhang, Lijie Grace
AU - Costantini, Marco
AU - Maiti, Tapas Kumar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
PY - 2025/10/1
Y1 - 2025/10/1
N2 - Over the past decade, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has made significant progress, transforming into a key innovation in tissue engineering. Despite the early strides, critical challenges remain in 3D bioprinting that must be addressed to accelerate clinical translation. In particular, there is still a long way to go before functionally-mature, clinically-relevant tissue equivalents are developed. Current limitations range from the sub-optimal bioink properties and degree of biomimicry of bioprintable architectures, to the lack of stem/progenitor cells for massive cell expansion, and fundamental knowledge regarding in vitro culturing conditions. In addition to these problems, the absence of guidelines and well-regulated international standards is creating uncertainty among the biofabrication community stakeholders regarding the reliable and scalable production processes. This review aims at exploring the latest developments in 3D bioprinting approaches, including various additive manufacturing techniques and their applications. A thorough discussion of common bioprinting techniques and recent progresses are compiled along with notable recent studies. Later we discuss the current challenges in clinical application of 3D bioprinting and the major bottlenecks in the commercialization of 3D bioprinted tissue equivalents, including the longevity of bioprinted organs, meeting biomechanical requirements, and the often underrated ethical and legal aspects. Amidst the progress of regulatory efforts for regenerative medicine, we also present an overview of the current regulatory concerns which should be taken into account to translate bioprinted tissues into clinical practice. At last, this review emphasizes future directions in 3D bioprinting that includes the transformative ideas such as bioprinting in microgravity and the integration of artificial intelligence. The study concludes with a discussion on the need for collaborative efforts in resolving the technical and regulatory constraints to improve the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of bioprinted tissue equivalents to ultimately accomplish their successful clinical implementation.
AB - Over the past decade, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has made significant progress, transforming into a key innovation in tissue engineering. Despite the early strides, critical challenges remain in 3D bioprinting that must be addressed to accelerate clinical translation. In particular, there is still a long way to go before functionally-mature, clinically-relevant tissue equivalents are developed. Current limitations range from the sub-optimal bioink properties and degree of biomimicry of bioprintable architectures, to the lack of stem/progenitor cells for massive cell expansion, and fundamental knowledge regarding in vitro culturing conditions. In addition to these problems, the absence of guidelines and well-regulated international standards is creating uncertainty among the biofabrication community stakeholders regarding the reliable and scalable production processes. This review aims at exploring the latest developments in 3D bioprinting approaches, including various additive manufacturing techniques and their applications. A thorough discussion of common bioprinting techniques and recent progresses are compiled along with notable recent studies. Later we discuss the current challenges in clinical application of 3D bioprinting and the major bottlenecks in the commercialization of 3D bioprinted tissue equivalents, including the longevity of bioprinted organs, meeting biomechanical requirements, and the often underrated ethical and legal aspects. Amidst the progress of regulatory efforts for regenerative medicine, we also present an overview of the current regulatory concerns which should be taken into account to translate bioprinted tissues into clinical practice. At last, this review emphasizes future directions in 3D bioprinting that includes the transformative ideas such as bioprinting in microgravity and the integration of artificial intelligence. The study concludes with a discussion on the need for collaborative efforts in resolving the technical and regulatory constraints to improve the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of bioprinted tissue equivalents to ultimately accomplish their successful clinical implementation.
KW - 3D bioprinting
KW - 4D bioprinting
KW - bioinks
KW - biomaterials
KW - tissue engineering
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012833491
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012833491#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a
DO - 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40513614
AN - SCOPUS:105012833491
SN - 1758-5082
VL - 17
JO - Biofabrication
JF - Biofabrication
IS - 4
M1 - 042003
ER -