Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

10-Year Resource Utilization and Costs for Cardiovascular Care

  • Leslee J. Shaw
  • , Abhinav Goyal
  • , Christina Mehta
  • , Joe Xie
  • , Lawrence Phillips
  • , Anita Kelkar
  • , Joseph Knapper
  • , Daniel S. Berman
  • , Khurram Nasir
  • , Emir Veledar
  • , Michael J. Blaha
  • , Roger Blumenthal
  • , James K. Min
  • , Reza Fazel
  • , Peter W.F. Wilson
  • , Matthew J. Budoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) imparts a heavy economic burden on the U.S. health care system. Evidence regarding the long-term costs after comprehensive CVD screening is limited. Objectives: This study calculated 10-year health care costs for 6,814 asymptomatic participants enrolled in MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), a registry sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Methods: Cumulative 10-year costs for CVD medications, office visits, diagnostic procedures, coronary revascularization, and hospitalizations were calculated from detailed follow-up data. Costs were derived by using Medicare nationwide and zip code–specific costs, inflation corrected, discounted at 3% per year, and presented in 2014 U.S. dollars. Results: Risk factor prevalence increased dramatically and, by 10 years, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was reported in 19%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. Self-reported symptoms (i.e., chest pain or shortness of breath) were common (approximately 40% of enrollees). At 10 years, approximately one-third of enrollees reported having an echocardiogram or exercise test, whereas 7% underwent invasive coronary angiography. These utilization patterns resulted in 10-year health care costs of $23,142. The largest proportion of costs was associated with CVD medication use (78%). Approximately $2 of every $10 were spent for outpatient visits and diagnostic testing among the elderly, obese, those with a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level >3 mg/l, or coronary artery calcium score (CACS) ≥400. Costs varied widely from <$7,700 for low-risk (Framingham risk score <6%, 0 CACS, and normal glucose measurements at baseline) to >$35,800 for high-risk (persons with diabetes, Framingham risk score ≥20%, or CACS ≥400) subgroups. Among high-risk enrollees, CVD costs accounted for $74 million of the $155 million consumed by MESA participants. Conclusions: Longitudinal patterns of health care resource use after screening revealed new evidence on the economic burden of treatment and testing patterns not previously reported. Maintenance of a healthy population has the potential to markedly reduce the economic burden of CVD among asymptomatic individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1078-1089
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume71
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • asymptomatic
  • cardiovascular disease screening
  • economics
  • long-term follow-up

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '10-Year Resource Utilization and Costs for Cardiovascular Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this