Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Press/Media
Datasets
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Food Science and Nutrition
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
College of Food, Agricultural & Natural Resource Sciences
Overview
Fingerprint
Network
Profiles
(54)
Projects and Grants
(315)
Research output
(3004)
Press/Media
(3)
Research output
Research output per year
1958
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2024
2462
Article
218
Chapter
209
Review article
27
Letter
88
More
23
Comment/debate
19
Conference contribution
12
Book
12
Conference article
10
Short survey
7
Editorial
3
Paper
2
Foreword/postscript
Research output per year
Research output per year
3 results
Publication Year, Title
(descending)
Publication Year, Title
(ascending)
Title
Type
Filter
Paper
Search results
2018
Comparative study of ANN (artificial neural network) versus RSM (response surface methodology) for predicting the recovery of phenolic compounds from spent coffee grounds by conventional and microwave assisted extraction
Budaraju, S.
&
Mallikarjunan, K. P.
,
Jan 1 2018
.
Research output
:
Contribution to conference
›
Paper
›
peer-review
Surface
100%
Microwave Assisted Extraction
100%
Phenolic Compound
100%
Coffee
100%
Response Surface Methodology
100%
1
Scopus citations
2010
Dietary fibre and satiety - Not all fibre is alike
Slavin, J. L.
,
Jan 1 2010
,
p. 333-340
.
8 p.
Research output
:
Contribution to conference
›
Paper
›
peer-review
Diet
100%
Dietary Fiber
100%
Starch
100%
Beverage
50%
Maize
50%
3
Scopus citations
2004
Dietary DNA topoisomerase 2 inhibitors (DNAT21) and infant leukemia (IL).
Spector, L. G.
,
Xie, Y.
,
Robison, L. L.
,
Heerema, N. A.
,
Hilden, J.
,
Lange, B.
,
Felix, C.
,
Davies, S.
,
Slavin, J.
,
Potter, J.
,
Blair, C. K.
&
Ross, J. A.
,
2004
.
Research output
:
Contribution to conference
›
Paper
›
peer-review