Description
This data underlies a systematic review project: "Is the Open Access Citation Advantage Real?" This project considers whether materials that are published open access receive a greater number of citations than materials published in subscription-based resources. The data here are extracted from 134 relevant studies. The data also include a risk of bias assessment that considers the methodological quality and flaws of the included studies.
Description
This dataset includes a single csv file of the supplementary data underlying the systematic review project. It is accompanied by detailed documentation.
Funding information
Sponsorship: Not applicable.
Referenced by
Manuscript forthcoming through PLoS One.
Description
This dataset includes a single csv file of the supplementary data underlying the systematic review project. It is accompanied by detailed documentation.
Funding information
Sponsorship: Not applicable.
Referenced by
Manuscript forthcoming through PLoS One.
| Date made available | Jun 3 2021 |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Data Repository for the University of Minnesota |
| Date of data production | Jul 2019 - Mar 2021 |
Research output
- 1 Article
-
Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles
Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C. & Riegelman, A., Jun 2021, In: PloS one. 16, 6 June, e0253129.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access172 Link opens in a new tab Scopus citations
Cite this
- DataSetCite